<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Implicit stereotypes predict sex differences in science and math achievement</title>
	<atom:link href="http://projectimplicit.wordpress.com/2009/06/22/implicit-stereotypes-predict-sex-differences-in-science-and-math-achievement/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://projectimplicit.wordpress.com/2009/06/22/implicit-stereotypes-predict-sex-differences-in-science-and-math-achievement/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Feb 2011 01:45:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Caroline Simard: &#34;Daring to Discuss Women in Science:&#34; A Response to John Tierney &#124; Click e-News</title>
		<link>http://projectimplicit.wordpress.com/2009/06/22/implicit-stereotypes-predict-sex-differences-in-science-and-math-achievement/#comment-65</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Caroline Simard: &#34;Daring to Discuss Women in Science:&#34; A Response to John Tierney &#124; Click e-News]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jun 2010 23:00:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://projectimplicit.wordpress.com/?p=20#comment-65</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] shows that math and science are indeed thought of as stereotypically male domains. Project Implicit at Harvard University studied half a million participants in 34 countries and found that that 70 percent of respondents [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] shows that math and science are indeed thought of as stereotypically male domains. Project Implicit at Harvard University studied half a million participants in 34 countries and found that that 70 percent of respondents [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Caroline Simard: &#34;Daring to Discuss Women in Science:&#34; A Response to John Tierney</title>
		<link>http://projectimplicit.wordpress.com/2009/06/22/implicit-stereotypes-predict-sex-differences-in-science-and-math-achievement/#comment-64</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Caroline Simard: &#34;Daring to Discuss Women in Science:&#34; A Response to John Tierney]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jun 2010 22:38:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://projectimplicit.wordpress.com/?p=20#comment-64</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] shows that math and science are indeed thought of as stereotypically male domains. Project Implicit at Harvard University studied half a million participants in 34 countries and found that that 70 percent of respondents [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] shows that math and science are indeed thought of as stereotypically male domains. Project Implicit at Harvard University studied half a million participants in 34 countries and found that that 70 percent of respondents [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tech &#38; Science &#187; Caroline Simard: &#34;Daring to Discuss Women in Science:&#34; A Response to John Tierney</title>
		<link>http://projectimplicit.wordpress.com/2009/06/22/implicit-stereotypes-predict-sex-differences-in-science-and-math-achievement/#comment-63</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tech &#38; Science &#187; Caroline Simard: &#34;Daring to Discuss Women in Science:&#34; A Response to John Tierney]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jun 2010 21:11:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://projectimplicit.wordpress.com/?p=20#comment-63</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] shows that math and science are indeed thought of as stereotypically male domains. Project Implicit at Harvard University studied half a million participants in 34 countries and found that that 70 percent of respondents [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] shows that math and science are indeed thought of as stereotypically male domains. Project Implicit at Harvard University studied half a million participants in 34 countries and found that that 70 percent of respondents [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Situation of Gender-Science Stereotypes &#171; The Situationist</title>
		<link>http://projectimplicit.wordpress.com/2009/06/22/implicit-stereotypes-predict-sex-differences-in-science-and-math-achievement/#comment-13</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The Situation of Gender-Science Stereotypes &#171; The Situationist]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 04:03:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://projectimplicit.wordpress.com/?p=20#comment-13</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] podcast of an interview with Situationist Contributor Brian Nosek about Project Implicit’s recent gender-science stereotypes article is available at the BBC World Service’s Science in Action [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] podcast of an interview with Situationist Contributor Brian Nosek about Project Implicit’s recent gender-science stereotypes article is available at the BBC World Service’s Science in Action [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BBC Story on recent gender-science article &#171; Project Implicit</title>
		<link>http://projectimplicit.wordpress.com/2009/06/22/implicit-stereotypes-predict-sex-differences-in-science-and-math-achievement/#comment-5</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[BBC Story on recent gender-science article &#171; Project Implicit]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 20:32:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://projectimplicit.wordpress.com/?p=20#comment-5</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Comments (RSS)       &#171; Implicit stereotypes predict sex differences in science and math&#160;achievement [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Comments (RSS)       &laquo; Implicit stereotypes predict sex differences in science and math&nbsp;achievement [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
